
3 More Questions For A Patent Podcast Pro (Part II)
Considering its importance to today's IP-driven economy, it is surprising that there is not more coverage of USPTO goings-on.
Considering its importance to today's IP-driven economy, it is surprising that there is not more coverage of USPTO goings-on.
As trademark law increases in popularity, attorneys will need instruction and advice they can trust. The founder of Trademarkabilities sits down for an interview to discuss her thoughts on why trademarks are so important, how attorneys can gain the confidence to handle trademark work, and more.
Please share your thoughts in this brief and anonymous survey.
Where evidence shows that the consuming public identifies a descriptive trademark with the trademark owner, it is likely worthy of federal trademark registration.
Someone -- apparently not related to the Floyd family -- has filed a federal trademark application for the name George Floyd. Sigh.
Domestic or foreign law, district court or the Patent and Trademark Office, judge or jury? These questions matter.
Columnist Gaston Kroub interviews Manny Schecter, a leading voice in the IP community.
Is your firm keeping up with legal finance and tech trends? The 2025 Legal Industry Report shows how firms optimize cash flow, automate payments, and use AI. Download now for key insights.
Why opportunistic plots to register trademarks for trending terms almost always fail.
Monopoly patent rights are not the same as traditional property rights.
The Supreme Court just agreed to decide a profoundly important question in patent law right now.
* The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has extended a deadline to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request asking who the director of the agency is. That's all they want. And the PTO asked for more time to respond! The absurdity of this reminds me of Apocalypse Now. [IP Watchdog] * You've heard about Justice Ginsburg's workout regimen. Well, Politico sent a reporter to do it and... it nearly broke him. [Politico] * Divorce judge sued for allegedly spitting on a former Mintz Levin attorney. The New York legal community keeping it classy. [Law360] * In totally unsurprising move, guy who thought the KKK was cool until he found out they smoked pot withdraws the government's objection to Texas efforts to suppress minority voting. [NY Times] * More law firms are changing their partner compensation models to create an even more competitive environment. There's no way this can backfire and create a woefully dysfunctional partnership. Nope. [Law.com] * The Jeffrey Wertkin case puts a spotlight on the whole whistle-blower unit. [Bloomberg] * Winston & Strawn are going after laterals pretty hard. [Am Law Daily] * Now might be a good time to make a donation to legal aid. [Litigation Daily]
This tweak to your financial management seems like a no-brainer.
Things not looking good for the USPTO.
This technology could prove to be the greatest biotech advance in recent history.
Companies attempt to get these kinds of superlative marks all the time, but it's nice to see the USPTO think past the end of its own "Approved!" stamp once in a while.
OK, now this is just getting silly.
Is it better to be in front of a male or female patent examiner? Are women or men more likely to get their patent applications allowed?